Back to projects
MSc thesis / research projectResearch Prototype / MSc ThesisEducational TechnologySaarland University

AI-Supported Question Generation for Scientific Reading

My MSc thesis explored AI-assisted question generation for scientific reading comprehension.

My role

Research design · Learning design · Educational evaluation

Current contribution

Within the limits of the thesis study, the results suggested that AI-generated questions can support scientific reading when they are connected to clear learning objectives, cognitive complexity, and thoughtful evaluation.

AI-Supported Question Generation for Scientific Reading — MSc thesis / research project

Case story

Overview

As part of my MSc in Educational Technology at Saarland University, I investigated how AI-generated questions can support scientific reading comprehension and cognitive engagement. The study used OwlMentor, an AI-supported learning prototype, to explore how question generation can scaffold active reading, self-explanation, and reflection.

Learning Problem

Scientific reading requires more than moving through a text. Learners need to identify central ideas, connect concepts, monitor understanding, and notice where their comprehension is incomplete.

Research Question

The thesis examined how AI-supported question generation might support scientific reading comprehension, self-explanation, reflection, and cognitive engagement during reading.

My Role

My role covered research design, learning design, educational problem framing, question-generation concepts, question type design across cognitive complexity levels, contribution to question formats based on learning objectives, suggested evaluation approaches including learning evaluation techniques and rubric-based AI evaluation concepts, study evaluation, data analysis, interpretation of findings, and discussion of educational implications.

Research Prototype: OwlMentor

OwlMentor was used as the research prototype for this thesis study. The core software implementation was developed by my supervisor / under academic supervision. My work focused on the educational design, research methodology, question framework, evaluation strategy, and analysis of learning outcomes.

Question Design Framework

I contributed to designing question types and complexity levels to support different learning objectives and cognitive processes. The question framework treated questions as prompts for comprehension, self-explanation, reflection, and deeper engagement rather than as simple quiz items.

Study Design

The study design connected the educational problem, generated question types, learner interaction, and evaluation strategy. Evaluation thinking included learning evaluation approaches and rubric-based concepts for assessing AI-generated question quality.

Key Findings

Within the limits of the sample, the thesis study indicated that AI-generated questions may support scientific reading when they are aligned with learning objectives, cognitive complexity, and meaningful reflection. The results suggested educational promise, while also showing the need for careful evaluation and interpretation.

Limitations

The findings should be interpreted cautiously because they come from a thesis study with a limited context and sample. The work should not be read as evidence of a launched product or published research.

What I Learned

I learned that AI-supported learning design depends on more than generating good outputs. It requires clear learning objectives, thoughtful question framing, evaluation criteria, and an understanding of how learners engage with questions during real reading tasks.

Thesis Materials

The linked MSc thesis and thesis presentation are presented as thesis materials, not as publications.

What this case can—and cannot—prove

Evidence available

Thesis and presentation materials, study design, analysis, findings, and limitations.

Boundaries and limitations

This is thesis research, not published research or a production AI system. The core OwlMentor software was not presented as Piumal's sole implementation.

Role relevance

Supports educational technology research, learning design, evaluation, and responsible AI-in-education positioning.

Materials & Links

Open the project evidence

Reports, posters, demos, code, and related links are collected here so visitors can inspect the work behind the case study.

2